Infertility has been defined as the disability to fulfill pregnancy after twelve months of regular sex coition, with no contraceptive taken. Male factor infertility was explained in terms of low spermatozoa concentration (oligozoospermia), or morphology (teratozoospermia), impaired motility (asthenozoospermia), or in some cases, total lack of spermatozoa in the ejaculate (azoospermia). In several cases, a collection of one, or more of these sperm variables defects may be noticed, evaluation these factors by the initial and most important step is seminal analysis. Our study aims to study some sperm characteristics in asthenozoospermia men in comparison with normozoospermia men before and after glass wool and Sephadex activation. This study involved 60 semen samples collected from male patients that came to male infertility clinic at Al-Nahrain University; the recruited semen samples were divided into 2 groups, (40 asthenozoospermic and 20 normozoospermic subjects). After collected semen samples, and assessed analysis of seminal fluid. Each semen samples were divided into 3 aliquots. The first aliquot prepared was In-Vitro to assessed sperm characterization before activation, the second part using glass wool filtration (GWF) technique, while the last part was prepared using Sephadex. Both techniques resulted equally in reducing sperm concentration, were equally effective in upgrading sperm motility and in minimizing round cell count; however, Sephadex was superior to glass wool method in upgrading the percentage of morphologically normal sperm. Both Sephadex and glass wool techniques has been proved effective to improve semen quality.
Background: The procedures of assisted reproductive technologies have been developed during recent years and have been revealed the need for new suitable and effective techniques of sperm treatment in the laboratory. Objectives: This study is designed to normozoospermic and asthenozoospermic compare the semen outcomes of two in vitro sperm activation techniques and evaluate their efficiency, namely; Glass wool filtration technique and a new technique of Glass wool filtration combined with Pentoxifylline. Subjects, Materials and Methods: Fifty five semen samples were collected from the patients, fifteen were obtained from normozoospermic men, forty were obtained from asthenozoospermic men who at tend the infertility clinic were involved in this study. Sperm parameters were assessed according to WHO (2010 and 1999). Post-activation of each sample were divided into two aliquots, the first one : using Glass wool filtration technique , the second : using Glass wool filtration technique with Pentoxifylline. Results: A significant increase of sperm motility, progressive sperm motility and morphologically normal sperm when using Glass wool filtration technique combined with Pentoxifylline as compared to Glass wool filtration technique. Regarding sperm agglutination and Round cells count the study showed the best results by decreasing their levels when using Glass wool filtration technique combined with Pentoxifylline as compared to Glass wool filtration technique alone. Conclusions: From the results of the present study, the sperm function parameters outcome when using glass wool filtration technique combined with Pentoxifylline were superior to other technique since it yields better sperm function parameters rather than the outcome of glass wool filtration ; respectively especially when using a low quality of semen samples such as decreased sperm function parameters (sperm motility) so it was fit in cases of asthenozoospermia which taken as an example of infertile group within this study.
Background: The intra uterine insemination (IUI) still an easy, simple and effective method to overcome the infertility that resulted from different causes. Although the equipments and methods of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) were highly developed, the percentage of successful IUI live-birth not exceed 20-30%. Objective: The present study was aimed to elucidated the cut off values of in vitro sperm preparation technique, follicular number and size, endometrial thickness and hormonal profile that lead to successful pregnancy rate (PR)following IUI. Materials and Methods: In retrospective study, one hundred cases of infertile couples were in who were became pregnant following IUI at the Institute of Infertility Diagnosis and Assisted Reproductive Technologies, through the period from January 2007 to January 2010. Depending on the results of retrospective study, IUI was achieved for 100 infertile patients between August 2010and June 2011. The mean of significant prognostic variables were measured in both studies namely: age, type of infertility, type of sperm activation techniques, the protocol of ovulation induction medicine, the mean of hormonal status of Luteinizing Hormone (LH), Estradiol(E2), and number with diameter of follicles, endometrial thickness a cycle day before hCG injection. Results: The protocol of ovulation induction in IUI cycles by using clomiphene citrate(CC) and recombinant gonadotropin (rFSH) was significantly(p<0.05) improve the IUI results compared to CC alone or CC with PergonalS. The mean values obtained by ultrasonography namely; two follicles, and dominant follicle of 19.5mm in size with endometrium thickness of >9.5mm were gave significantly successful IUI outcome compared to other values. In prospective study similar results were obtained, therefore the overall pregnancy rate was 37% per cycle. Conclusion: The calculated data of successful IUI outcome from retrospective study gave a best pregnancy rate in prospective study which was 37%. Consequently, these results can be considered as guideline for physician who interest in assisted reproduction to have a success in IUI.