Background: The procedures of assisted reproductive technologies have been developed during recent years and have been revealed the need for new suitable and effective techniques of sperm treatment in the laboratory. Objectives: This study is designed to normozoospermic and asthenozoospermic compare the semen outcomes of two in vitro sperm activation techniques and evaluate their efficiency, namely; Glass wool filtration technique and a new technique of Glass wool filtration combined with Pentoxifylline. Subjects, Materials and Methods: Fifty five semen samples were collected from the patients, fifteen were obtained from normozoospermic men, forty were obtained from asthenozoospermic men who at tend the infertility clinic were involved in this study. Sperm parameters were assessed according to WHO (2010 and 1999). Post-activation of each sample were divided into two aliquots, the first one : using Glass wool filtration technique , the second : using Glass wool filtration technique with Pentoxifylline. Results: A significant increase of sperm motility, progressive sperm motility and morphologically normal sperm when using Glass wool filtration technique combined with Pentoxifylline as compared to Glass wool filtration technique. Regarding sperm agglutination and Round cells count the study showed the best results by decreasing their levels when using Glass wool filtration technique combined with Pentoxifylline as compared to Glass wool filtration technique alone. Conclusions: From the results of the present study, the sperm function parameters outcome when using glass wool filtration technique combined with Pentoxifylline were superior to other technique since it yields better sperm function parameters rather than the outcome of glass wool filtration ; respectively especially when using a low quality of semen samples such as decreased sperm function parameters (sperm motility) so it was fit in cases of asthenozoospermia which taken as an example of infertile group within this study.
Background: Semen preparation techniques were developed to separate motile sperm that are morphologically normal from seminal plasma to optimize successful assisted reproductive technology cycles which seem to be the most effective options in cases of a male factor infertility. Objective: The objective of the present study was to compare between outcomes of two sperm preparation techniques for asthenozoospermic patients includes:1-Centrifugation swim up technique.2-Glass wool filtration technique. Subjects, Materials and Methods: Fifty three infertile males were participated in this study during their attendance to the Infertility Clinic at High Institute for Infertility Diagnosis and Assisted Reproductive Technologies; Al-Nahrain University. Semen samples were collected and SFA was done according to WHO (2010 and 1999). Each semen sample was divided into two aliquots. The first one prepared using centrifugation swim up technique, while the other one prepared using glass wool filtration technique then sperm parameters were assessed for both techniques and the results were statistically analyzed. Results: After in vitro sperm activation using both techniques, there was significant reduction (P<0.05) in the sperm concentration, significant improvement (P<0.05) in the percentages of sperm motility and morphologically normal sperm when compared to pre-activation. Present study appeared that the glass wool filtration technique resulted in significantly (P<0.05) better results for sperm concentration and total number of progressive motile sperm than the swim-up technique. The present study proved that there was significant (P<0.05) improvement in sperm parameters (increment for sperm motility (%), progressive sperm motility (%), total number of progressive motile sperm and normal sperm morphology (%), while reduction for round cell count and sperm agglutination percent) for all cases using glass wool filtration techniques. In contrast, there was failure of sperm activation for 10 cases using centrifugation swim up technique. Conclusions: From results of the present study, the sperm parameters outcomes using glass wool filtration technique was superior to the outcomes of centrifugation swim up technique when prepare semen of asthenozoospermic patients.