Iraqi Journal of Embryos and Infertility Researches
Login
IJEIR
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Latest Issue
    • All Issues
  • Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Guide for Authors
    • Authorship
    • Article Processing Charges (APC)
  • Reviewers
    • Guide for Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
  • Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Plagiarism
    • Allegations of Misconduct
    • Appeals and Complaints
    • Corrections and Withdrawals
    • Open Access
    • Copyright Policy
    • Archiving Policy
    • Privacy Policy
  • About
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Team
    • Journal Insights
    • Peer Review Process
    • Announcements
    • Contact

Search Results for agonist

Article
A comparison between short GnRH agonist and antagonist protocols in expected normal responder females following ICSI

Rabab Zahir Al-Yasiry, Rihab Abbas Ali, Muhjah Falah Hasan

Pages: 25-34

PDF Full Text
Abstract

The selection of protocols in controlled ovarian stimulation during intracytoplasmic sperm injection affect the treatment outcomes. Both GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist protocols are clinically utilized, therefore comparision of these protocols is important for the evaluation of their laboratory and clinical outcomes.To compares the short GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist protocols effectiveness in expected normal responder females undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Methods: A retrospective study was involved 60 women aged less than 35 with antimullerian hormone (AMH) more than 2.5 ng/ml. Participants women were assigned to either group1 short GnRH agonist protocol and group2 GnRH antagonist protocol. The outcomes measured including total oocyte, mature and immature oocytes, number and quality of embryo and pregnancy rate.The short GnRH agonist protocol group showed statistical significant benefit in oocyte yield (p- value 0.04), metaphase I (p- value 0.09), metaphase II (p- value 0.03), embryo number (p- value 0.04), embryo quality (p-value 0.01) and pregnancy rate in expected normal responder women compared to GnRHantagonist protocol. The short GnRHagonist protocol reveals favorable ICSI outcomes than antagonist protocol and may be better choice in expected normal responder women.

Article
Effect of Ovarian Stimulation Protocol on Embryo Quality in IVF-ICSI

Mufeda A. Jwad, Ban A.Abdulmajeed, Ula M. Al-Kawaz

Pages: 55-63

PDF Full Text
Abstract

Background:Defects in reproduction that may involve both the male & female partners result in the inability to procreate which is known as infertility. The use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART’s) has been increasing over the past three decades. Many efforts have been done to compensate for unsatisfac-tory results in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures, so that patients undergo different ovarian stimulation protocols to control retrieval of multiple oocytes in a single cycle. Although ovarian stimulation has an important role in ART’s, it may also have detrimental effects on oocyte quality, embryo quality, and IVF outcomes. Objectives: To assess the effect of long agonist versus antagonist protocols on oocyte and embryo quality in IVF-Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Patients,Materials and Methods: This comparative study was done on the embryos of seventy one infertile fe-males who were undergoing Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment regardless to the presence or absence of previous trials. These patients were divided into two groups, 45 of them treated with agonist protocol and other 26 patients treated with antagonist protocol. First oocyte retrieved was used for further assessment. Of the 71 oocytes, there were eight immature oocytes (3 at germinal vesicle (GV) stage, 5 at metaphase I (MI) stage) and three abnormal oocytes, and these were excluded from the following ICSI treatment. Assessment and comparison of oocyte maturity, fertilization rate, cleavage rate and resulting embryo quality were done. Results:The results of the present study showed significant difference (p<0.05) in oocyte number and maturity but no significant (p>0.05) difference between the group treated with long agonist and those on antagonist protocol regarding fertilization rate, cleavage rate, and embryo quality. Conclusions:The type of protocol used in in-vitro fertilization has no detrimen-tal effect on oocyte or embryo quality.

Article
Outcome of GnRH antagonist ICSI cycles triggered by GnRH agonist plus Recombinant hCG versus triggered with Recombinant hCG alone in fresh autologous ICSI cycle

Wafaa Mohammed Abed, Mohammed Oda Selman High Institute of Infertility Diagnosis and Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Al Nahrain

Pages: 119-131

PDF Full Text
Abstract

To explore whether dual triggering for final oocyte maturation using a low dose of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) plus gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) is as effective as the standard dose of recombinant hCG triggering alone in term of a total number of retrieved oocytes, fertilization and pregnancy rate in fresh autologous antagonist intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. 80 infertile women undergoing ICSI, aged ˂ 40 years, 18˂ Body mass index ˂30 Kg/m2 included in fresh autologous antagonist ICSI cycles. 40 women received a Standard dose of recombinant hCG (500 µg) alone and 40 women received GnRH-a (0.2 mg triptorelin plus 250 µg recombinant hCG) were used for final oocytes maturation. This study was conducted at the High Institute for Infertility Diagnosis and Assisted Reproductive Techniques, Al Nahrain University. The mean total number of retrieved oocytes, fertilization, and pregnancy rate were measured. The mean total oocyte number being statistically higher in the dual trigger group. The mean number of fertilized oocytes and clinical pregnancy rates was higher in the dual trigger group than in the control group, but the difference showed borderline statistical significance. Furthermore, fertilization rates show no statistical difference between the control group and the dual trigger group. Results of the study confirm that dual triggers show favorable improvement in fresh autologous antagonist ICSI cycles with the use of GnRH agonists plus hCG compared with hCG alone for triggering of final oocyte maturation.

Article
Effect of Administration of Single Dose GnRH Agonist in Luteal Phase on Implantation Rate of Fresh ICSI Cycles

Sally Alaa, Nadia Al-Hilli, Mufeda Ali Jwad

Pages: 1-14

PDF Full Text
Abstract

The luteal phase (LP) in the fresh ICSI cycle is insufficient, adequate LP support is one of the approved treatments for improving implantation and pregnancy rates. It is generally known that the LP is inadequate after ovarian stimulation due to negative from supra-physiological blood levels of steroids released by numerous corporal luteal, LH concentrations are low during the luteal phase. In this study, patients were divided into two groups: (40) patients as study group; those who received GnRHa (Decapeptil 0.1 mg), three days after embryo transfer, in addition to conventional luteal phase support (LPS) in the LP to increase the implantation and pregnancy rate in IVF; and their control group (40) received standard LPS only. On the second day of stimulation, blood samples for FSH, LH, TSH, E 2 , and prolactin were taken. On the day of ovulation induction, measure E 2 , progesterone, and LH; and on the day of embryo transfers, measure progesterone and LH. The overall characteristics of the patients in both groups were not significantly different. There was also no significant change in the number of total oocytes, mean of metaphase II oocytes percent, cleavage rate, grade I embryo percent, or serum hormones level between the study and control groups (p > 0.05). GnRH agonist treatment in the luteal phase improves clinical pregnancy and implantation rate in fresh ICSI cycles but is not statistically significant.

1 - 4 of 4 items

Search Parameters

Journal Logo
Iraqi Journal of Embryos and Infertility Researches (IJEIR)

High Institute of Infertility Diagnosis and Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Al-Nahrain University

  • Copyright Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • Cookie Settings
Licensing & Open Access

CC BY 4.0 Logo Licensed under CC-BY-4.0

This journal provides immediate open access to its content.

Editorial Manager Logo Elsevier Logo

Peer-review powered by Elsevier’s Editorial Manager®

Copyright © 2026 Al-Nahrain University, its licensors, and contributors. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.