Cover
Vol. 10 No. 2 (2020)

Published: August 31, 2020

Pages: 116-128

Research Article

The effect of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia on oocyte and embryo quality and pregnancy success rate during in-vitro fertilization.

Abstract

Women who have transvaginal oocyte retrieval feel nervous and have mild to moderate pain because a needle is used to poke holes in the vaginal skin and ovarian capsule to get the oocytes. The aim of this study is compare between general and spinal anesthesia effect on ICSI outcome . A cross-sectional study was conducted in the High Institute of Infertility Diagnosis and Assisted Reproductive Technologies/ Al-Nahrain University, from first April 2021 to the first of February 2022. Patients were randomized blindly at time of oocyte retrieval for types of anesthesia given: (50 women subjected to spinal anesthesia and 50 women subjected to general anesthesia). All females were subjected to flexible antagonist protocol. Also, all of them had the same surgical procedure by the same physicians. ICSI outcome was compared between the groups. The study showed there was non-significant difference (p>0.05) between the two groups regarding pregnancy rate with higher oocyte number in women subjected to spinal anesthesia than those who were under the general anesthesia although the difference was not statistically significant. The fertilized oocyte number was non significantly higher in spinal anesthesia group than the general anesthesia. So; spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia have comparable ICSI outcome.

References

  1. Gambineri A, Laudisio D, Marocco C, Radellini S, Colao A, Savastano S; Obesity Programs of nutrition, Education, Research and Assessment (OPERA) group. Female infertility: which role for obesity? Int J Obes Suppl. 2019 Apr; 9 (1):65-72. Doi: 10.1038/s41367-019-0009-1.
  2. Omani-Samani R, Amini P, Navid B, Sepidarkish M, Maroufizadeh S, Almasi- Hashiani A. Prevalence of Sexual Dysfunction among Infertile Women in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Fertil Steril. 2019 Jan;12 (4):278-283. Doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2019.5395.
  3. Yun L, Liqun W, Shuqi Y, Chunxiao W, Liming L, Wei Y. Acupuncture for infertile women without undergoing assisted reproductive techniques (ART): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98 (29):e16463. Doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016463.
  4. Eccles, A., 2018. Obstetrics and gynaecology in Tudor and Stuart England. Routledge.
  5. De Geyter C. Assisted reproductive technology: Impact on society and need for surveillance. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Feb;33 (1):3-8. Doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2019.01.004.
  6. Malhotra, N., Malhotra, J., Saxena, R. and Bora, M.N., Jeffcoate's Principles of Gynaecology. Jaypee Brothers, Medical Publishers Pvt. Limited 2018.
  7. Montgomery, L., Plavsic, S.K. and Molokwu, J., Intern Tips in Obstetrics & Gynecology. JP Medical Ltd 2016.
  8. Bai F, Wang DY, Fan YJ, Qiu J, Wang L, Dai Y, Song L. Assisted reproductive technology service availability, efficacy and safety in mainland China: 2016. Hum Reprod. 2020 Feb 29;35 (2):446-452. Doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez245.
  9. Kawwass JF, Badell ML. Maternal and Fetal Risk Associated With Assisted Reproductive Technology. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;132 (3):763-772. Doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002786.
  10. Buisman ETIA, Grens H, Wang R, Bhattacharya S, Braat DDM, Huppelschoten AG, van der Steeg JW. Trends in research on pain relief during oocyte retrieval for IVF/ICSI: a systematic, methodological review. Hum Reprod Open. 2022 Feb 16;2022 (1):hoac006. Doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoac006.
  11. Matsota P, Sidiropoulou T, Vrantza T, Boutsikou M, Midvighi E, Siristatidis C. Comparison of Two Different Sedation Protocols during Transvaginal Oocyte Retrieval: Effects on Propofol Consumption and IVF Outcome: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 1;10 (5):963. Doi: 10.3390/jcm10050963.
  12. Scanlon, C., & Green, D. General anesthesia or sedation for oocyte retrieval? Assisted Reproduction Techniques: Challenges and Management Options, 323- 330, 2021.
  13. Beck, R., Brizzi, A., Cinnella, G., Raimondo, P., & Kuczkowski, K. M. Anesthesia and analgesia for women undergoing oocyte retrieval. In Pick up and oocyte management (pp. 99-119). Springer, Cham 2020. Doi:10.1007/978-3-030-28741-2_7
  14. Jain K, Bhardwaj N, Sharma A, Kaur J, Kumar P. A randomised comparison of the effects of low-dose spinal or general anaesthesia on umbilical cord blood gases during caesarean delivery of growth-restricted foetuses with impaired Doppler flow. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013 Jan;30 (1):9-15. Doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283564698.
  15. Hwang JH, Kim BW. Comparison of General Anesthesia and Combined Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia for Gasless Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology. JSLS. 2022 Apr- Jun;26 (2):e2022.00004. Doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00004.
  16. Cai QF, Wan F, Huang R, Zhang HW. Factors predicting the cumulative outcome of IVF/ICSI treatment: a multivariable analysis of 2450 patients. Hum Reprod. 2011 Sep; 26 (9):2532-40. Doi: 10.1093/humrep/der228.
  17. Aghaamoo S, Azmoodeh A, Yousefshahi F, Berjis K, Ahmady F, Qods K, Mirmohammadkhani M. Does Spinal Analgesia have Advantage over General Anesthesia for Achieving Success in In-Vitro Fertilization? Oman Med J. 2014 Mar;29 (2):97-101. Doi: 10.5001/omj.2014.24.
  18. Azmude A, Agha'amou S, Yousefshahi F, Berjis K, Mirmohammad'khani M, Sadaat'ahmadi F, Ghods K, Dabbagh A. Pregnancy outcome using general anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia for in vitro fertilization. Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Sep;3 (2):239-42. Doi: 10.5812/aapm.11223.
  19. Circeo L, Grow D, Kashikar A, Gibson C. Prospective, observational study of the depth of anesthesia during oocyte retrieval using a total intravenous anesthetic technique and the Bispectral index monitor. Fertil Steril. 2011 Sep;96 (3):635-7. Doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.06.010.
  20. Kim WO, Kil HK, Koh SO, Kim JI. Effects of general and locoregional anesthesia on reproductive outcome for in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. J Korean Med Sci. 2000 Feb;15 (1):68-72. Doi: 10.3346/jkms.2000.15.1.68.