Cover
Vol. 9 No. 2 (2019)

Published: December 31, 2019

Pages: 78-94

Research Article

Using Uterine Biophysical Profile as a Predictor of Endometrial Receptivity and Pregnancy in Stimulated IUI Cycles

Abstract

Implantation failure and disorders of endometrial receptivity represent an essential cause of infertility; multiple parameters were needed to predict the uterine receptivity understanding that no sole parameter could predict the same. A score was termed as (Uterine Biophysical Profile) could be utilized as a predictor of endometrial receptivity. To evaluate the predictive potential of Uterine biophysical profile of both endometrial receptivity and pregnancy outcome in infertile women undergoing Intrauterine Insemination (IUI). The current cross-sectional study was conducted in the High Institute for Infertility Diagnosis and Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Al Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq from the 1 st of Oct. 2018 till 1 st of May 2019 involving seventy women of infertile couples with the same inclusion and exclusion criteria. Uterine biophysical profile was evaluated using a doppler ultrasound examination and then a score was calculated and correlated to pregnancy outcome. The mean Uterine Artery Pulsatility Index (UAPI) was significantly lower in women with positive pregnancy in comparison to women with negative pregnancy, 2.10±0.19 versus 2.47±0.65, respectively (P=0.032). Moreover, no women with Pulsatility Index (PI) score (0) succeeded to get pregnant and the higher the score, the higher the rate of pregnancy (P=0.006). Furthermore, Spearman correlation showed significant positive correlation between positive pregnancy outcome and UAPI (r=0.365; P= 0.002). The mean total score was significantly higher for pregnant women than in women with negative pregnancy, 18.27±1.33 versus 16.35±2.47, respectively (P= 0.005). The cutoff value was >17 with an acceptable accuracy level of 74.2. The sensitivity of that cutoff vale was 80 % and the specificity was 65.5%. Uterine artery pulsatility index and total uterine biophysical score are the principal predictors of positive pregnancy outcomes in infertile women undergoing IUI.

References

  1. Vander Borght M, Wyns C. Fertility and infertility: Definition and epidemiology. Clinical Biochemistry. Elsevier BV; 2018;62:2–10. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbioche m.2018.03.012 [PubMed][Elsevier]
  2. Agarwal A, Mulgund A, Hamada A, Chyatte MR. A unique view on male infertility around the globe. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. Springer Science and Business Media LLC; 2015;13(1). Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015- 0032-1 [PubMed][PMC][BMC]
  3. Datta J, Palmer MJ, Tanton C, Gibson LJ, Jones KG, Macdowall W, et al. Prevalence of infertility and help seeking among 15 000 women and men. Human Reproduction. Oxford University Press (OUP); 2016;31(9):2108–18. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew 123 [PubMed][PMC][OxFord]
  4. Almasi-Hashiani A, Omani-Samani R, Mohammadi M, Amini P, Navid B, Alizadeh A, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of preeclampsia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. Springer Science and Business Media LLC; 2019;19(1). Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019- 2291-x [PubMed][PMC][BMC]
  5. Allahbadia GN. Intrauterine Insemination: Fundamentals Revisited. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India. Springer Science and Business Media LLC; 2017;67(6):385–92. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13224-017- 1060-x [PubMed][PMC]
  6. Ombelet W, Van Robays J. Artificial insemination history: hurdles and milestones. Facts Views Vis Obgyn, 2015;7(2):137-143. [EuroPMC]
  7. Silva Martins R, Helio Oliani A, Vaz Oliani D, Martinez de Oliveira J. Subendometrial resistence and pulsatility index assessment of endometrial receptivity in assisted reproductive technology cycles. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. Springer Science and Business Media LLC; 2019;17(1). Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019- 0507-6 [BMC]
  8. Tiwary B., Dhaliwal L. Gainder S. Effect of GnRH antagonist on follicular development and uterine biophysical profile in controlled ovarian stimulation. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015;4(1):157-163. [ijrcog]
  9. Navinchandra Rn, Shankar S, Kavitha D, Kamath M, Devdas S, Vineela P. Relationship between uterine scoring system for reproduction and pregnancy in controlled ovarian stimulation- intrauterine insemination cycles. IVF Lite. Medknow; 2016;3(3):115. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2348- 2907.204669 [ivflite]
  10. El-Zenneni H, Moustafa R, Abdel- Hafeez M, El-Salally H, Abdel-Kader A, Elnaggar A. Assessment of uterine, subendometrial blood flows and endometrial gland vascular endothelial growth factor (EG-VEGF) in women with unexplained infertility. Middle East Fertility Society Journal. Springer Science and Business Media LLC; 2015;20(2):119–26. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mefs.2014. 07.002 [Mendeley][ResearchGate]
  11. Khan MS, Shaikh A, Ratnani R. Ultrasonography and Doppler Study to Predict Uterine Receptivity in Infertile Patients Undergoing Embryo Transfer. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India. Springer Science and Business Media LLC; 2015;66(S1):377–82. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13224-015- 0742-5 [PMC][PubMed]
  12. Bhadauria K, Sahni R, Verma S, Khatri PQ. Colour Doppler ultrasound in controlled ovarian stimulation with intrauterine insemination. Apollo Medicine. Medknow; 2012;9(3):252– 62. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apme.2012. 07.014 [Elsevier]
  13. Baruffi RL, Contart P, Mauri AL, Peterson C, Felipe V, Franco JG. A uterine ultrasonographic scoring system as a method for the prognosis of embryo implantation in an ICSI program. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Geneics. 2002;19(3):99-102. [EuroPMC]
  14. Aghahoseini M, Tuba K, Marsousi V, Aleyasin A. Assessment of endometrial-subendometrial blood flow detected by color Doppler sonography and uterine receptivity in infertile women. Acta Med Iran. 2015;46:461–6. [ResearchGate][ActaMedIr]
  15. Kolibianakis E, Zikopoulos K, Fatemi H, Osmanagaoglu K, Evenpoel J, Van Steirteghem A, et al. Endometrial thickness cannot predict ongoing pregnancy achievement in cycles stimulated with clomiphene citrate for intrauterine insemination. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. Elsevier BV; 2004;8(1):115–8. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1472- 6483(10)60505-6 [PubMed][Elsevier]
  16. Habibzadeh V, Nematolahi Mahani S, Kamyab H. The correlation of factors affecting the endometrial thickness with pregnancy outcome in the IUI cycles. International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine. 2011;9(1): 41-46. [PMC]
  17. Kim A, Lee J, Ji Y, Lee H, Lee E, Kim H, Oh Y. Do Endometrial Movements Affect. The Achievement of Pregnancy during Intrauterine Insemination? International Journal of Fertility and Sterility. 2015;8(4):399- 408. [PMC][EuroPMC]
  18. Masrour M, Yoonesi L, Aerabsheibani H. The effect of endometrial thickness and endometrial blood flow on pregnancy outcome in intrauterine insemination cycles. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. Medknow; 2019;8(9):2845. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc _212_19 [jfmpc]
  19. Prasad S, Goyal R, Kumar Y, Nayar P, Hajela S, Kumaran A, Vairagi R, Chauhan S. The Relationship Between Uterine Artery two-dimensional Color Doppler Measurement and Pregnancy Outcome: A Prospective Observational Study. Journal of Reproduction and Infertility. 2017;18(2):251-256. [PubMed][PMC]
  20. Guedes-Martins L, Gaio R, Saraiva J, Cerdeira S, Matos L, Silva E, et al. Reference Ranges for Uterine Artery Pulsatility Index during the Menstrual Cycle: A Cross-Sectional Study. Crispi-Brillas F, editor. PLOS ONE. Public Library of Science (PLoS); 2015;10(3):e0119103. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone .0119103 [PMC][PlosOne] Biography Dr. Rawaa Saad Hasan Abunayla She graduated from Tikrit University, College of Medicine in 1996. Completed permanency in gynecology and Obstetrics in 2002. Received the Diploma in Obstetrics and Gynaecology in 2007 from Baghdad University, College of Medicine. She worked as a senior at Al Rumaitha General Hospital. Currently she is a student in the High Diploma in Clinical Infertility and ARTs in High institute for Infertility Diagnosis and ARTs Al Nahrain University, 2020. Dr. Lubna Amer Al-Anbari She received the M.B.CH.B., the Higher diploma from the college of medicine, University of Baghdad, in 2004, and 2011, respectively. She received the board in infertility from the Iraqi society of medical specialists in 2012. She published many kinds of research both local and international. She supervised many students. She held many academic positions. Dr. Muayad S. Abood He received the M.B.CH.B. from Al-Kufa University, the M.Sc., and the Ph.D. in Pharmacology from Al Nahrain University, in 1998, 2008, and 2014, respectively. He occupied several academic positions including the dean assistant for scientific affairs at Al Nahrain University. He has more than 10 published papers both local and international. Dr. Huda A. R. Hussaini She received the M.B.Ch.B: Babylon University, college of medicine, in 2000. The diploma in Radiology from the University of Baghdad in 2007. She is a fellow of the Iraqi Board for Medical Specialization, Council of Radiology since 2008. Currently, she is an assistant professor. Al Nahrain University, College of Medicine, department of surgery ( specialist radiologist ). She is a Member of staff in the high Institute of infertility diagnosis and ARTS. Including the ultrasound department in the institute since 2018. She has Participations in a lot of annual meetings, medical conferences. Seminars, continuous learning, and thesis discussion. She is a member of the Iraqi medical association, the Iraqi Society of radiologist and medical imaging, Iraqi Journal of Embryos infertility researches, European Society for Hybrid, Molecular, and translation imaging. She published more than articles and has supervised many students. How to cite: Abunayla RSH, Al-Anbari LA, Abood MS, Hussaini HAR. Using Uterine Biophysical Profile as a Predictor of Endometrial Receptivity and Pregnancy in Stimulated IUI cycles; Iraqi Journal of Embryos and Infertility Researches (IJEIR), (2019); 9(2): 78-94. Doi: http://doi.org/10.28969/IJEIR.v9.i2.r6 © 2019 Author(s)